What makes the Nike + iPod Sport Kit tick?

Comments

i've been wondering how the thing works, too, and have spent plenty of time thinking about it as i ran. regardless, however it works, for me, it does: my distance results seem pretty much spot-on, and that's without calibration. our grid system's distance convention (8 blocks = 1 mile) is pretty accurate, which provides something of an as-you-run q.a., but the gmaps offer confirmation. i actually tried calibrating it via treadmill, which threw things off so that i've since reset it to the defaults. it's all very peculiar...
The Nike+iPod Kit has been surprisingly accurate for me over the past six months... usually within a few hundredths of a mile on a 3 mile run. I've found the sport kit more accurate than Gmap pedometer.

As to the sensor internals, EETimes wrote an article in August discussing their findings. From the article:

"In the transmitter implementation, this equates to a low-cost stroke of genius in the form of using a piezoelectric disk speaker–common to inexpensive toys and greeting cards–in reverse mode. By allowing some travel in the plate of the speaker, the piezoelectric effect causes the transducer to function as the pickup of foot action. About the size (and cost) of a dime, the speaker isn’t driven to make sound, but rather monitored for motion-induced electrical signals."

You can read more on my site.


Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Dan Budiac

About Me

Dan Budiac
United States
Thirtysomething professional nerd who recently moved to New York City for love. And pizza.
AIM:
dansays9
del.icio.us:
dansays
Dopplr:
dansays
Facebook:
758759529
Google Talk:
dansays@gmail.com
Last.fm:
dansays
Twitter:
dansays
  • Powered by Vox

Last Run